Cognitive Ability Personality and Learning Strategies in Academic Achievement:

Academic achievement remains a central focus of educational systems worldwide, serving as a key determinant of personal and societal progress. Understanding the underlying factors that contribute to academic success is critical for designing effective teaching methodologies and learning environments. Cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies represent three pivotal dimensions influencing academic outcomes. While each operates independently to some extent, their interactions create complex dynamics that significantly affect individual performance. In the rest of this article, we are going to explore the cognitive ability personality and learning strategies in academic achievement.

1. Cognitive Abilities:

1.1 Definition and Dimensions: Cognitive abilities refer to the mental processes involved in acquiring knowledge and understanding, including memory, reasoning, problem-solving, and attention (Deary, 2012). These abilities are often categorized into general intelligence, also known as the \u2018g\u2019 factor, and specific cognitive skills such as verbal comprehension, working memory, and processing speed (Spearman, 1904).

1.2 The Role of Intelligence in Academic Achievement: Intelligence is widely recognized as a strong predictor of academic success, with numerous studies demonstrating a robust correlation between IQ scores and academic performance (Ritchie & Tucker-Drob, 2018). Fluid intelligence, which encompasses reasoning and problem-solving abilities, is closely linked to success in subjects like mathematics and science. In contrast, crystallized intelligence, involving accumulated knowledge and verbal skills, plays a significant role in language-based subjects such as literature and history (Cattell, 1963).

Moreover, longitudinal research has consistently highlighted the predictive validity of IQ in academic outcomes. A meta-analysis by Roth et al. (2015) found that intelligence accounted for approximately 50% of the variance in educational achievement across diverse samples, underscoring its central role.

1.3 Cognitive Flexibility and Executive Function: Beyond general intelligence, cognitive flexibility and executive function are critical for adapting to diverse learning demands. Executive functions, which include working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility, enable students to manage time effectively, prioritize tasks, and maintain focus\u2014all essential skills for academic success (Diamond, 2013).

For instance, working memory allows students to hold and manipulate information over short periods, facilitating complex problem-solving and comprehension tasks. Similarly, inhibitory control helps learners resist distractions and stay on task, while cognitive flexibility supports the ability to shift perspectives and strategies when faced with new challenges (Miyake et al., 2000).

1.4 Neural Correlates and Developmental Aspects: Advances in neuroscience have provided valuable insights into the neural underpinnings of cognitive abilities. The prefrontal cortex, for example, is instrumental in executive functioning, supporting planning, decision-making, and self-regulation (Stuss & Knight, 2013). The hippocampus, on the other hand, plays a crucial role in memory formation and retrieval, processes that are vital for academic learning (Eichenbaum, 2004).

Developmentally, cognitive abilities evolve throughout childhood and adolescence, influenced by genetic and environmental factors. The theory of cognitive development proposed by Piaget (1954) highlights distinct stages, from sensorimotor to formal operational, each characterized by increasingly sophisticated mental processes. Similarly, Vygotsky\u2019s (1978) concept of the zone of proximal development emphasizes the importance of social interactions in cognitive growth.

1.5 Enhancing Cognitive Abilities: Educational interventions can enhance cognitive abilities, particularly during critical developmental windows. Programs such as working memory training and problem-solving exercises have shown promise in improving cognitive skills (Melby-Lerv\u00e5g & Hulme, 2013). Additionally, activities that promote metacognition\u2014such as self-reflection and goal setting\u2014can further support cognitive development.

1.6 Theories of Cognitive Abilities and Academic Achievement: Multiple theoretical frameworks have explored the relationship between cognitive abilities and academic performance. For instance, Spearman’s two-factor theory of intelligence emphasizes the general factor (\u2018g\u2019) as a predictor of success across diverse cognitive tasks (Spearman, 1904). In contrast, Cattell’s theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence distinguishes between innate reasoning abilities and learned knowledge (Cattell, 1963), offering a nuanced perspective on cognitive contributions to academic achievement.

Additionally, Carroll’s Three-Stratum Theory integrates general intelligence at the apex, followed by broad abilities like memory and processing speed, and specific skills at the base (Carroll, 1993). This hierarchical model aligns with evidence that various cognitive domains contribute uniquely to different academic disciplines.

1.7 The Role of Cognitive Load: Cognitive load theory, proposed by Sweller (1988), underscores the limitations of working memory in processing and retaining information. High cognitive load\u2014caused by overly complex tasks or insufficient background knowledge\u2014can hinder learning and performance. Reducing extraneous cognitive load through clear instruction and scaffolding is essential to optimize student outcomes (Chandler & Sweller, 1991).

1.8 Cognitive Development Across the Lifespan: Cognitive development is a dynamic process influenced by both maturation and environmental factors. While early childhood represents a critical period for developing foundational skills like attention and memory, adolescence is marked by significant growth in executive functions due to prefrontal cortex maturation (Blakemore & Choudhury, 2006). These changes highlight the importance of age-appropriate educational strategies that align with developmental trajectories.

1.9 The Influence of Socioeconomic and Environmental Factors: Socioeconomic status (SES) significantly impacts cognitive abilities and academic performance. Children from higher SES backgrounds often benefit from enriched environments, better nutrition, and access to quality education, all of which support cognitive development (Hackman et al., 2010). Conversely, adverse conditions such as poverty and chronic stress can impair cognitive functioning, particularly in domains like working memory and attention (Evans & Schamberg, 2009).

1.10 Practical Implications for Enhancing Cognitive Abilities: To support cognitive development and academic achievement, educators and policymakers can implement targeted interventions:

  • Cognitive Training Programs: Activities such as memory games, puzzles, and reasoning exercises can strengthen cognitive skills, particularly in young learners (Jaeggi et al., 2008).
  • Executive Function Development: Teaching strategies like goal setting, self-monitoring, and problem-solving fosters executive functions, improving students’ ability to plan and organize their work.
  • Enrichment Opportunities: Access to diverse experiences, such as reading programs, arts, and science activities, can promote both fluid and crystallized intelligence.
  • Addressing Disparities: Interventions designed to mitigate SES-related disparities, such as providing high-quality early childhood education, are essential for equitable cognitive development (Duncan & Magnuson, 2013).

1.11 Emerging Research and Future Directions: Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience, such as the use of neuroimaging techniques, have deepened our understanding of how brain structures support specific cognitive abilities. For example, functional MRI studies reveal the importance of the default mode network in reflective thinking and learning (Raichl]e, 2015). These insights pave the way for innovative educational technologies, including brain-based learning tools and AI-driven adaptive platforms.

Furthermore, research into neuroplasticity\u2014the brain’s ability to reorganize itself\u2014suggests that cognitive abilities can be improved across the lifespan through deliberate practice and environmental changes (Kolb & Whishaw, 2009). This challenges the traditional view of intelligence as a fixed trait, emphasizing the potential for lifelong learning and growth.

2. Personality and Its Role in Academic Achievement:

Personality traits are crucial determinants of academic success, influencing not only how students approach learning tasks but also their motivation, persistence, and interactions with peers and educators. Unlike cognitive abilities, which primarily determine how well students process and retain information, personality traits shape their behavioral and emotional responses to the learning environment. This section delves into the theoretical underpinnings, key personality traits, and their specific contributions to academic achievement.

2.1 Theoretical Perspectives on Personality: Personality is often conceptualized within the framework of the Five-Factor Model (FFM), which identifies five broad dimensions of personality: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (McCrae & Costa, 1987). These traits collectively encompass a wide range of individual differences in thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Each dimension is linked to specific academic behaviors:

  • Openness to Experience: Curiosity, creativity, and a preference for novel experiences, which foster engagement with complex or abstract learning material.
  • Conscientiousness: Organization, responsibility, and goal-directed behavior, which directly influence study habits and time management.
  • Extraversion: Sociability and assertiveness, which may enhance collaborative learning and participation in group activities.
  • Agreeableness: Empathy and cooperation, which can improve classroom dynamics and peer relationships.
  • Neuroticism: Emotional instability and anxiety, which may hinder academic performance by increasing stress and reducing focus (John & Srivastava, 1999).

2.2 Conscientiousness (The Strongest Predictor): Among the Big Five traits, conscientiousness consistently emerges as the most robust predictor of academic success (Poropat, 2009). High conscientiousness is associated with disciplined study routines, perseverance in the face of challenges, and effective self-regulation. Students who score high on this trait are more likely to set and achieve academic goals, submit assignments on time, and perform well on exams. In contrast, low conscientiousness is linked to procrastination, disorganization, and inconsistent effort, which negatively affect academic outcomes.

2.3 Openness to Experience and Intellectual Engagement: Openness to experience has a positive impact on academic achievement, particularly in subjects that require creativity, critical thinking, and adaptability. Students high in openness are more likely to enjoy intellectual challenges and engage with complex ideas, which enhances learning outcomes in areas like literature, arts, and sciences (Komarraju et al., 2011). This trait is particularly significant in higher education, where abstract thinking and self-directed learning are essential.

2.4 The Role of Emotional Stability: Emotional stability, or low neuroticism, plays a pivotal role in maintaining focus and resilience under pressure. Students with higher emotional stability are better equipped to manage stress and anxiety, which are common in academic settings. Conversely, high neuroticism is linked to test anxiety, fear of failure, and difficulty concentrating, all of which can undermine academic performance (Zeidner, 1998).

2.5 Extraversion and Agreeableness in Collaborative Learning: Extraversion and agreeableness are particularly relevant in collaborative and interactive learning environments. Extraverted students are more likely to participate actively in discussions and group projects, enhancing their learning through social interaction. Agreeable students, known for their cooperative and empathetic nature, contribute to positive group dynamics, which can improve collective problem-solving and knowledge sharing (Barrick & Mount, 1991).

2.6 Personality and Academic Resilience: Personality traits also influence how students respond to academic setbacks. For example:

  • Conscientiousness and emotional stability are associated with greater resilience, enabling students to recover quickly from poor grades or failed exams.
  • Openness to experience fosters adaptive coping strategies, such as seeking novel solutions to academic challenges.
  • Conversely, high neuroticism may exacerbate the negative impact of setbacks, leading to feelings of helplessness or avoidance behaviors (Martin & Marsh, 2008).

2.7 Practical Applications (Enhancing Academic Outcomes): Educators and institutions can leverage insights into personality traits to support academic achievement through targeted interventions:

  • Fostering Conscientiousness: Training programs focused on time management, goal setting, and self-discipline can help students develop conscientious behaviors.
  • Encouraging Emotional Stability: Stress management workshops and counseling services can support students in managing anxiety and emotional challenges.
  • Promoting Openness: Creating intellectually stimulating environments, such as research opportunities and creative assignments, can engage students with high openness.
  • Enhancing Collaboration: Group projects and peer learning activities can harness the strengths of extraverted and agreeable students while encouraging others to build social and cooperative skills.

2.8 Future Directions in Personality Research: Emerging research in personality psychology explores the interplay between traits and contextual factors, such as cultural norms and educational systems, in shaping academic behaviors. Additionally, advances in psychometric tools and machine learning offer new opportunities to assess and predict personality influences on academic performance. Understanding these dynamics can inform the design of personalized learning strategies that align with students’ individual strengths and challenges.

3. Learning Strategies and Their Impact on Academic Achievement:

Learning strategies refer to the techniques, methods, or approaches that students use to acquire, process, and retain information. These strategies are vital for academic success, as they help students effectively navigate the demands of diverse educational tasks. By employing the right strategies, learners can optimize their study habits, enhance comprehension, and improve retention, thereby achieving better academic outcomes. This section explores the types of learning strategies, their theoretical underpinnings, and their influence on academic performance, along with practical applications and interventions.

3.1 Theoretical Frameworks on Learning Strategies: Learning strategies are often categorized within theoretical frameworks such as cognitive psychology and educational psychology. Key frameworks include:

  • Cognitive Information Processing Theory: This theory emphasizes how learners encode, store, and retrieve information. Effective learning strategies facilitate these processes by minimizing cognitive load and enhancing memory consolidation (Sweller, 1988).
  • Constructivist Learning Theory: This perspective highlights active engagement and the construction of knowledge through meaningful experiences. Strategies aligned with this theory encourage learners to integrate new information with prior knowledge (Vygotsky, 1978).
  • Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Models: SRL emphasizes metacognitive, motivational, and behavioral processes, such as goal setting, self-monitoring, and self-evaluation, which are critical for effective learning (Zimmerman, 2002).

3.2 Types of Learning Strategies: Learning strategies are typically classified into cognitive, metacognitive, and resource management strategies:

3.2.1 Cognitive Strategies: These involve basic techniques to process information effectively, including:

  • Rehearsal: Repeating information to enhance retention (e.g., memorization).
  • Elaboration: Connecting new information to existing knowledge through methods such as paraphrasing or creating analogies.
  • Organization: Structuring information by using outlines, concept maps, or categorization to identify relationships and hierarchies.

3.2.2 Metacognitive Strategies: These strategies focus on planning, monitoring, and regulating one’s learning processes:

  • Planning: Setting specific goals, allocating time effectively, and selecting appropriate study methods.
  • Monitoring: Assessing comprehension and progress during learning.
  • Evaluating: Reflecting on outcomes to identify strengths and areas for improvement.

3.2.3 Resource Management Strategies: These involve managing external resources and one’s environment:

  • Time Management: Prioritizing tasks and adhering to study schedules.
  • Effort Regulation: Sustaining motivation and perseverance, especially when faced with challenging tasks.
  • Help-Seeking: Seeking assistance from peers, teachers, or resources when necessary.

3.3 The Role of Motivation in Learning Strategies: The effectiveness of learning strategies is closely linked to motivational factors. Students who are intrinsically motivated are more likely to adopt deep learning strategies, such as elaboration and critical thinking, whereas extrinsically motivated students may rely on surface strategies, like rote memorization (Deci & Ryan, 2000).

3.4 The Impact of Learning Strategies on Academic Achievement: Research consistently demonstrates that students who employ effective learning strategies perform better academically:

  • Cognitive Strategies: Techniques like elaboration and organization enhance comprehension and retention, particularly in subjects requiring analytical thinking (Weinstein & Mayer, 1986).
  • Metacognitive Strategies: Self-regulated learners who monitor their progress and adapt their strategies are more likely to achieve their academic goals (Pintrich, 1999).
  • Resource Management Strategies: Effective time management and effort regulation are linked to higher grades and reduced academic stress (Kitsantas et al., 2004).

3.5 Challenges in Implementing Learning Strategies: While learning strategies are effective, several barriers can hinder their adoption:

  • Lack of Awareness: Many students are unaware of effective strategies and rely on inefficient techniques, such as passive rereading.
  • Limited Motivation: Without intrinsic or extrinsic motivation, students may not consistently apply learning strategies.
  • Poor Self-Regulation: Students who lack self-regulation skills may struggle to plan, monitor, and adjust their strategies.

3.6 Practical Applications and Interventions: Educators and institutions can foster the development of learning strategies through targeted interventions:

  • Teaching Explicit Strategies: Incorporating strategy instruction into curricula, such as teaching students how to create concept maps or set specific study goals.
  • Promoting Metacognitive Awareness: Encouraging students to reflect on their learning processes and outcomes through journaling or peer discussions.
  • Providing Resources and Support: Offering workshops on time management and study skills, along with access to academic support centers.
  • Integrating Technology: Using educational apps and tools that support active learning, such as flashcard apps, online quizzes, or learning analytics platforms.

3.7 Future Directions in Learning Strategies Research: Future research should explore:

  • Cultural Influences: Examining how cultural norms shape the adoption and effectiveness of learning strategies.
  • Technological Integration: Investigating how emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, can enhance strategy instruction.
  • Personalization: Developing adaptive learning systems that tailor strategies to individual learners’ needs and preferences.

4. Interplay Between Cognitive Abilities, Personality, and Learning Strategies in Academic Achievement:

The relationship between cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies is dynamic and interdependent, collectively shaping academic outcomes. While each of these factors independently contributes to academic success, their interplay offers a more comprehensive understanding of how students learn and perform. This section explores the synergies and interactions among these elements, supported by empirical evidence and theoretical insights.

4.1 Cognitive Abilities and Personality: Cognitive abilities and personality traits are often considered distinct yet complementary predictors of academic performance. While cognitive abilities determine the intellectual capacity for processing and applying knowledge, personality traits influence the consistency and manner in which these abilities are utilized. For example:

  • Conscientiousness and Cognitive Abilities: Conscientious students often maximize their cognitive potential through disciplined study habits and effective time management, compensating for lower cognitive ability in some cases (Noftle & Robins, 2007).
  • Openness to Experience and Intelligence: Openness to experience is positively correlated with intellectual curiosity and a preference for complex cognitive tasks, enhancing the application of reasoning and critical thinking skills (von Stumm et al., 2011).
  • Emotional Stability and Cognitive Functioning: High levels of emotional stability reduce the impact of stress and anxiety, thereby allowing students to perform closer to their cognitive potential during high-stakes situations like exams (Zeidner, 1998).

4.2 Cognitive Abilities and Learning Strategies: Cognitive abilities also influence the selection and effectiveness of learning strategies. Students with higher cognitive abilities are more likely to adopt deep learning strategies, such as elaboration and critical thinking, while those with lower abilities may rely on surface strategies, like rote memorization (Diseth & Martinsen, 2003). However, the relationship is bidirectional: effective learning strategies can amplify the benefits of cognitive abilities by enhancing information processing and retention.

4.3 Personality and Learning Strategies: Personality traits shape the choice, consistency, and adaptability of learning strategies:

  • Conscientiousness: Students high in conscientiousness tend to use organizational and time management strategies, contributing to sustained academic effort (Richardson et al., 2012).
  • Openness to Experience: This trait fosters a preference for exploratory and elaborative learning strategies, promoting deeper understanding and creativity.
  • Neuroticism: Students high in neuroticism may struggle to adopt effective strategies due to anxiety and fear of failure, often leading to avoidance behaviors (Komarraju et al., 2011).

4.4 Triadic Interactions and Academic Achievement: The interplay between cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies is best understood through triadic interactions. For instance:

  • Cognitive Abilities and Conscientiousness: High cognitive ability combined with conscientiousness often leads to the effective application of advanced learning strategies, resulting in superior academic performance.
  • Personality and Strategy Use: Openness to experience can enhance the use of creative and adaptive learning strategies, particularly in cognitively demanding subjects.
  • Self-Regulation as a Mediator: Metacognitive strategies serve as a bridge, enabling students to leverage their cognitive abilities and personality traits effectively (Pintrich, 1999).

4.5 Practical Implications: Understanding these interactions has significant implications for educational practice:

  • Personalized Learning Approaches: Tailoring interventions based on individual profiles of cognitive abilities, personality traits, and preferred strategies can maximize academic outcomes.
  • Skill Development: Educators can help students with lower cognitive abilities develop compensatory strategies, such as organizational tools or rehearsal techniques.
  • Emotional Support: Addressing personality traits like neuroticism through counseling or stress management programs can enhance strategy use and overall performance.
  • Holistic Assessments: Incorporating measures of personality and self-regulated learning into academic assessments can provide a more accurate prediction of student success.

4.6 Future Directions: Future research should explore the following areas:

  • Longitudinal Studies: Examining how the interplay between these factors evolves across different educational stages.
  • Cultural Variations: Investigating how cultural contexts influence the relationships among cognitive abilities, personality, and learning strategies.
  • Technological Integration: Leveraging machine learning and analytics to provide real-time insights into student profiles and recommend tailored strategies.

5. Educational Implications of Cognitive Abilities, Personality, and Learning Strategies:

The integration of cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies provides valuable insights for designing effective educational systems and practices. This section focuses on how these factors influence teaching methodologies, curriculum design, and student support systems to foster academic success and holistic development.

5.1 Personalized Learning Approaches: One of the most significant educational implications is the shift toward personalized learning approaches. By recognizing the interplay between cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies, educators can design tailored interventions to meet the diverse needs of students:

  • Cognitive Abilities: Students with high cognitive abilities may benefit from accelerated programs or challenging tasks that promote critical thinking and creativity. Those with lower abilities can be supported through scaffolded instruction and tools that simplify complex tasks.
  • Personality Traits: For instance, students with high conscientiousness might excel with structured schedules, while those high in openness may thrive in project-based learning environments.
  • Learning Strategies: Personalized coaching can help students develop strategies suited to their unique strengths and weaknesses, such as emphasizing metacognitive strategies for those with strong self-regulation skills.

5.2 Curriculum Design: Incorporating the principles of cognitive psychology and personality research into curriculum design can significantly enhance learning outcomes:

  • Differentiated Instruction: Tailoring lessons to account for individual differences in cognitive abilities ensures that all students can engage with the material effectively.
  • Focus on Self-Regulation: Embedding self-regulated learning activities into curricula fosters the development of essential skills such as goal setting, self-monitoring, and reflection.
  • Interdisciplinary Learning: Encouraging exploration across disciplines can leverage traits like openness to experience and promote deeper learning.

5.3 Teacher Training and Development: Teachers play a crucial role in implementing practices that address the diverse needs of students. Professional development programs should focus on:

  • Understanding Individual Differences: Training teachers to assess and respond to variations in cognitive abilities, personality traits, and preferred learning strategies.
  • Promoting Emotional Intelligence: Helping teachers develop empathy and strategies to support students with emotional challenges, such as those high in neuroticism.
  • Facilitating Strategy Instruction: Equipping educators with techniques to teach effective learning strategies, including metacognitive and organizational skills.

5.4 Academic Support Services: Educational institutions can establish support systems to address the holistic needs of students:

  • Mentoring Programs: Pairing students with mentors who can guide them in developing effective learning strategies and managing personality-related challenges.
  • Counseling Services: Offering psychological support to help students manage stress, anxiety, and other emotional barriers to learning.
  • Learning Centers: Providing access to resources and workshops focused on time management, test preparation, and critical thinking skills.

5.5 Technology Integration: The use of technology in education can enhance the application of cognitive, personality, and strategy-based insights:

  • Adaptive Learning Systems: These systems use algorithms to personalize learning experiences based on students’ cognitive profiles and learning preferences.
  • Gamification: Incorporating game-based elements into learning platforms can engage students with different personality traits, particularly those low in motivation.
  • Learning Analytics: Real-time data on student performance can help educators identify patterns and intervene effectively to address gaps in learning.

5.6 Equity and Inclusion: Understanding the interplay of cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies also informs efforts to promote equity and inclusion:

  • Reducing Barriers: Identifying and addressing disparities in access to resources, such as tutoring or technology, that enhance learning.
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Designing curricula and support systems that respect and incorporate diverse cultural perspectives.
  • Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Creating flexible learning environments that accommodate students with varying abilities and needs.

5.7 Future Directions in Educational Practices: As research continues to uncover new insights into the relationship between cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies, future educational practices may focus on:

  • Neuroscience-Based Interventions: Using findings from cognitive neuroscience to optimize teaching methods and learning environments.
  • Global Collaboration: Sharing best practices and research across educational systems worldwide to promote innovation and equity.
  • Sustainability in Education: Integrating these principles to prepare students for lifelong learning and adaptability in a rapidly changing world.

Final Thoughts, the intricate interplay between cognitive abilities, personality traits, and learning strategies underscores the multifaceted nature of academic achievement. Cognitive abilities provide the intellectual foundation, enabling students to process, analyze, and apply knowledge effectively. Personality traits, such as conscientiousness and openness, shape the consistency, adaptability, and depth of learning efforts. Learning strategies act as the bridge, translating potential and traits into tangible outcomes by equipping students with the tools to plan, monitor, and optimize their academic pursuits.

Recognizing the interconnectedness of these factors offers a comprehensive framework for fostering academic success. Educators, policymakers, and researchers must embrace this complexity to design inclusive, personalized, and evidence-based educational practices. By nurturing cognitive potential, leveraging personality strengths, and promoting effective learning strategies, we can empower students to achieve not only academic excellence but also lifelong learning and personal growth.

In a rapidly evolving world, where adaptability and continuous learning are essential, understanding and applying the insights from this triadic relationship is paramount. The goal of education should extend beyond grades, cultivating resilient, self-regulated, and intellectually curious individuals capable of thriving in diverse and unpredictable environments. Through this lens, the synergy of cognitive abilities, personality, and learning strategies becomes not just a pathway to academic success but a cornerstone for building a brighter future.

References:

  1. Blakemore, S. J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3–4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x
  2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
  3. Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046743
  4. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
  5. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571312
  6. Deary, I. J. (2012). Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 453–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100353
  7. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
  8. Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303225
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  10. Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.2.109
  11. Eichenbaum, H. (2004). Hippocampus: Cognitive processes and neural representations that underlie declarative memory. Neuron, 44(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.028
  12. Evans, G. W., & Schamberg, M. A. (2009). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and adult working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6545–6549. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811910106
  13. Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(9), 651–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2897
  14. Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(19), 6829–6833. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801268105
  15. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
  16. Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2004). Self-regulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: A predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-473
  17. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2009). An introduction to brain and behavior (3rd ed.). Worth Publishers.
  18. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2011). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 472–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.007
  19. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 45(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20231
  20. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
  21. Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228
  22. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  23. Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116
  24. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
  25. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
  26. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
  27. Raichle, M. E. (2015). The brain’s default mode network. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 38, 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030
  28. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
  29. Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774253
  30. Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002
  31. Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
  32. Stuss, D. T., & Knight, R. T. (Eds.). (2013). Principles of frontal lobe function (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199837755.001.0001
  33. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  34. von Stumm, S., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Ackerman, P. L. (2011). Reexamining typical intellectual engagement and its relation to personality, intelligence, and student achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310365871
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  36. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). Macmillan.
  37. Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2730-6
  38. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2